Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2864 14
Original file (NR2864 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOK CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
754 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100°

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

DIC
Docket No. NR2864-14
2 Sep 14
from: Chairman, Boarc fox Correction of Naval Recoxras
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: ss.
2

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Fnei: (1) DD Form 149 wfattachments
{2) OCNO memo 5420 Ser N133D/178 dtd 15 Apr i4
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
Lo establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB).

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George,
_ reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the. Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining Lo
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants: favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. NR2864-14

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

Tha 7A month a
ae Ade a abe ay Ae ee bbe

1070/621), executed on or about 26 February 2014, is null and void.

=

awk PRIA TITATIO
MENO Vay rune

b. The Petitioner was discharged on 27 June 2013 and reenlisted
on 28 dune 2013. The term is 6 years. Note; Petitioner attended
Submarine Training Facility (S CUBTRAFAC NFK) from 20 May 2013 to 28
June 2013. Furthermore, Petitioner was required to extend/reenlist to
meet his Projected Rotation Date of Juiy 2016.

c. This change will entitle the Petitioner to a zone “B” SRB
with an award level of 1.5 ($45,000 dollar award ceiling) for the STS
rate. Remaining obligated service to 27 March 2015 will be deducted
from SRB computation.

6. Note: the Enlisted Submarine Pay Program moniter (N133D3 at
(703) 604-5502) will restore (START) CONSUBPAY entitlement effective
28 June 2013, vice 26 April 2014.

e. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Tt ig certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is true and complete record of
the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

   
 

Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e}
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Na vy .
yy

ROBERT J. O'NETLU
RPxecutive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8745 13

    Original file (NR8745 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR8745-13 29 Apr 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ~ Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below ghould be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12688 14

    Original file (NR12688 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an agreement to extend enlistment, and then cancel and issue, an immediate reenlistment contract. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3781 14

    Original file (NR3781 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    an DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ae. NR3781-14 21 Nov 14 prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “BY” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4194 14

    Original file (NR4194 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “BY Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB}. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Midboe, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR528 14

    Original file (NR528 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR528-14 27 Jun 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2952 14

    Original file (NR2952 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinaiter yeferred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice. CONCLUSION Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3382 14

    Original file (NR3382 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “AY Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3949 14

    Original file (NR3949 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “BY Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on , 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3326 14

    Original file (NR3326 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3283 14

    Original file (NR3283 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...